Lilliefors/Van Soest’s test of normality
نویسندگان
چکیده
The normality assumption is at the core of a majority of standard statistical procedures, and it is important to be able to test this assumption. In addition, showing that a sample does not come from a normally distributed population is sometimes of importance per se. Among the many procedures used to test this assumption, one of the most well-known is a modification of the Kolomogorov-Smirnov test of goodness of fit, generally referred to as the Lilliefors test for normality (or Lilliefors test, for short). This test was developed independently by Lilliefors (1967) and by Van Soest (1967). The null hypothesis for this test is that the error is normally distributed (i.e., there is no difference between the observed distribution of the error and a normal distribution). The alternative hypothesis is that the error is not normally distributed. Like most statistical tests, this test of normality defines a criterion and gives its sampling distribution. When the probability associated with the criterion is smaller than a given α-level, the
منابع مشابه
Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests
The importance of normal distribution is undeniable since it is an underlying assumption of many statistical procedures such as t-tests, linear regression analysis, discriminant analysis and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). When the normality assumption is violated, interpretation and inferences may not be reliable or valid. The three common procedures in assessing whether a random sample of indep...
متن کاملStatistical Understanding on the Pre-processing of Vnir Spectra Data from Soil Samples with Different Preparations
Statistical analyses of the relationship between visible and near-infrared (VNIR) spectra and soil parameters usually require the normal distribution of wavelength variables. Most previous studies examined only the distribution of soil parameters, while the distribution of each VNIR spectra wavelength was ignored. Moreover, how the sample preparation process and spectral pre-processing procedur...
متن کاملOn the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your perso...
متن کاملVisual EDF Software to Check the Normality Assumption
Maria E. Calzada and Stephen M. Scariano Loyola University New Orleans New Orleans, LA 70118 [email protected] Abstract: A host of materials in an introductory level statistics course relies on the “normality assumption.” However, assessing normality is a very subtle and difficult task, even for expert data analysts. To aid our student’s understanding we have written a program that implements a...
متن کاملDo we need to examine the quantitative data obtained from toxicity studies for both normality and homogeneity of variance?
Most of the statistical techniques used to evaluate the data obtained from toxicity studies are based on the assumption that the data show a normal distribution and homogeneity of variance. Literature review on toxicity studies on laboratory animals reveals that in most of the cases homogeneity of variance alone is examined for the data obtained from these studies. But the data that show homoge...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006